Login or Register to become a member of Climate Environmental here.
You may use the search engine to search for archived Articles and Features.
GO
Login/Register  Account
10th June 2008
Climate and Environment Media Contact Us Click here to download Environment Magazine Click here to go to the EASTjournal Archive Click her to go to the SustainableTransport Show site Click here to subscribe to our weekly newswire informing you on all aspects of Environment Media
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size
CEM
 
Click here to add our newscast to your iGoogle startpage.
You may use our link to put a newsticker of the latest Climate and Environment news on you website.
We have a categorised RSS newsfeed you can put on your site. Or you may use our syndication banners.
Conferences
 Opinion Latest Opinion:
-- Cambridge UK Is Too Congested
-- Climate Ark Proposes A Carbon Tax

-- Is this Too Much Greenwash?
Latest News Latest News
Opinion Opinion
Main Daily Leader Main Daily Leader
Columns Columns
Features Features
Events Events
About Us About Us
Other Interesting Sites Other Sites

Accessories
Syndication Tickers Syndication Tickers
rss newsAdd to Google
Bookmark
About Us Sitemap

Call for Cars to Show Their Lifetime Cost

UnRated: Click here to rateClick here to rateClick here to rateClick here to rateClick here to rate
Chris Innis, www.bbc.co.uk

A Government adviser, Prof Julia King has called for the lifetime costs of running a car to be prominently displayed in the showroom. this would replace the current regime where new car buyers are told of ownership costs for the first year. Prof King in the report argues that showing the lifetime costs would be more persuasive and help car owners make better decision.

The report says a 4.4 litre petrol Range Rover, driven 12,000 miles a year for 10 years, would cost more than £35,000 in petrol and vehicle excise duty. this compares with a diesel Peugeot 307 which would cost £11,000.

Another suggestion in the report is a colour coded tax disc which is calculated against emissions levels.

The report says a 4.4 litre petrol Range Rover, driven 12,000 miles a year for 10 years, would cost more than £35,000 in petrol and vehicle excise duty. this compares with a diesel Peugeot 307 which would cost £11,000.

The report believes that information presented in this form will make buyers make greener choices by creating peer pressure and also allow local authorities to offer discounts to greener cars.

Prof King wants car manufacturers to be forced to publish comparative figures showing how their models compare with other manufacturers in the same class of car.

On biofuels, she counsels caution against the negative effects of an uncontrolled expansion, but suggests that the government mandates fuel companies to include a set proportion of biofuels in the mix at the pump.

 

So not complete lifetime costs then?
Subscriber

For a moment I thought you were serious. Actually looking at how a vehicle impacts through it's entire life from construction to scrap yard and beyond. Instead you are talking about running costs for 10 years.

Don't forget the horendous impact the prius has in construction - those living in Canada where the raw materials for the batteries are dug out of the ground will testify. It is then shipped half way around the globe to Swansea where it is procesed before being shipped to Japan to be put into the batteries and vehicle. The vehicle is then shipped back to Europe to be sold and is only likely to survive 10 years on the road at which point those batteries become another problem becaus by then the technology will have moved on making them obsolete and useless.

I'm all for looking at lifetime costs as long as it's geniune lifetime and not a convenient slice.

Respond To Original Comment | this Comment
Mr David Horne
David Horne

Surley if we are to examine lifetime costs then, apart from fuel costs and VED costs, we must include manufacturing and disposal costs. this would then enable a betetr comoarison to be made regarding the impact of diferent technologies, e.g. is a petrol hybrid better environmentally, taking all impacts into account, than the equivalent diesel version?

Respond To Original Comment | this Comment
Ben Stall
Ben

Surely the government has reached a good compromise and should be seen in that light

Respond To Original Comment | this Comment
Comments.
To be able to post comments you must be a member of Climate and Environment Media or EASTjournal.
If you are not yet a member you may apply here.
To be emailed a forgotten password Click here.
this is a 2D comments board and you may comment on other's comments.
Please use it responsibly.
Title
Comment
Email
Password
Email a friend this Article
Related Articles
Carbon Taxed At 4.4 Cents A Tonne In San Francisco03/06/2008
UK Budget A Flop12/03/2008
Call For Cars To Show Their Lifetime Cost12/03/2008