Login or Register to become a member of Climate Environmental here.
You may use the search engine to search for archived Articles and Features.
GO
Login/Register  Account
9th June 2008
Climate and Environment Media Contact Us Click here to download Environment Magazine Click here to go to the EASTjournal Archive Click her to go to the SustainableTransport Show site Click here to subscribe to our weekly newswire informing you on all aspects of Environment Media
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size
CEM
 
Click here to add our newscast to your iGoogle startpage.
You may use our link to put a newsticker of the latest Climate and Environment news on you website.
We have a categorised RSS newsfeed you can put on your site. Or you may use our syndication banners.
Conferences
 Opinion Latest Opinion:
-- Cambridge UK Is Too Congested
-- Climate Ark Proposes A Carbon Tax

-- Is this Too Much Greenwash?
Latest News Latest News
Opinion Opinion
Main Daily Leader Main Daily Leader
Columns Columns
Features Features
Events Events
About Us About Us
Other Interesting Sites Other Sites

Accessories
Syndication Tickers Syndication Tickers
rss newsAdd to Google
Bookmark
About Us Sitemap

Rising Oil Prices: How Will We Drive Our Cars?

Rated: Click here to rateClick here to rateClick here to rateClick here to rateClick here to rate

Andrew Johnson

What Hope For Alternative Fuels?

“Oil is like a wild animal. Whoever captures it, has it”
Jean Paul Getty

First came the credit crunch which squeezed new investment from Environment Industries; following that Oil prices have been pushed sky high – quoted prices of $200 a barrel for future delivery: it looks now like we are moving into territory not seen since the mid 70s; a time of strikes and devaluation.

The 1970s, apart from being my childhood, saw a previously unimaginable wage-price spiral. Inflation expectations bid up pay raises; prices increased and the problem rolled back on itself. Remind you of something? The price of oil was high then and given that global monetary policy has been rudely, some say savagely, awakened from a decade of economic euphoria, the credit crunch has people worried.

But what of Bio-fuels, Ethanol, Hydrogen power; could they not save us. The problem with Oil is not its rarity – that argument should arrive in another fifty years – it is its relative scarcity in the short term. The problem is that the oil underground need to be brought to the surface, refined and then distributed; often oil is bought and paid for years in advance. The Arabs cannot just 'turn on the taps' like the simplistic notion Gordon Brown has.

Oil's new inflationary price seems to have been exacerbated as an indirect effect of the credit crunch. Speculators have pounced like greedy hording cats cutting the supply chain - raising prices of commodities generally (even bread has risen).
Oil for two years time is quoted at $200 dollars a barrel but for sixteen years time it is still only at $130.

In the short term we may have to learn to be more efficient in our behaviour rather than apply our engineering to different fuel.

this short-term inflationary position means than any investors banking on a quick return for an alternative fuel will largely be throwing their money away unless the need for alternative fuel is driven by political measures. In ten years time the fuel shortfall will have been made up. Ultimately there is still another fifty years of oil left at the same levels we are pumping today even accounting for a meteoric rise that will occur when the Chinese become mobile.

For investment this means that the US with a major reliance on large vehicles is in a worse position than Europe; I foresee a major rethink on design automobile policy taking shape USA side. The USA laughed at the Fiat 500 and the Mini but I am wondering whether the last laugh will come from Europe when Fat Hank tries to squeeze in behind the wheel. The USA is much more at risk from fuel shortage than the rest of the world.

Bio-fuels cannot replace oil immediately. The problem with Bio-fuels are they are essentially solar power in another form; yes, you can produce diesel from chip oil but you would have to be as fat as a dozen Florida grandmothers to keep up the supply.
Ethanol is a disaster; it not only needs vast acres of rain-forest to be cleared for the sugar-cane but also requires almost as much power for distillation as it produces. this power can be produced by Nuclear Power, wind power or any of the other alternatives – but if so why not produce Hydrogen instead?
The most widely available alternative fuel is LPG which although cleaner and cheaper is unlikely to withstand a huge leap in demand. Certainly in the short term an increase in supply is doubtful.

So what are the options?



In the short term we may have to learn to be more efficient in our behaviour rather than apply our engineering to different fuel. Telematics and GPS may make our journeys shorter – except that most journeys are repeated and therefore well known. To save we will have to reorganise and encourage people to take one not multiple shopping trips – can’t wait to tell my mother – or pay the price. In the USA market forces have already forced a rethink and the number of miles driven has fallen radically last month.

In the medium term there are vehicles on the drawing-board which will be more efficient and it is in efficiency and not alternative fuels that we must put our hope – until the vast quantities of cash that have been squandered by hedge-funds into buying barrels of oil and putting the price up have been withdrawn. Perhaps this cash pot snatched from the housing market can be re-invested in something more worthwhile than Oil like fusion power, wind power, wave power or in fact anything that would have the side effect of benefiting future society. I have no political views on Nuclear Power being too young for politically correct CND and yet old enough to study science - my personal view is that nuclear fusion (not to be confused with fission) should be invested in.

In the long term our children and grandchildren must do what we have failed to do and be both efficient and find alternative fuels for our vehicles - it is time for us to think about this too. this oil price increase is an early warning of more to come.

Meanwhile my childrens' childhood-memories of oil prices rising scarily will be just like mine were; how the clock-of-generations' turns...

What Hope For Alternative Fuels?

Your article is mainly correct, and I would agree that Nuclear Fusion, is one of the key hopes for the future.

However, pure research, as opposed to applied research, is a long term venture required, consistent levels of funding.  The sort of funding, given by the most goverments during times of crises, such as a World War.  Such as the Manhatten Project, and it also requires, a good supply of well trained Scientists, such as those supplied by default by the Totalitarian Regimes of the Soviets & Fascists, during World War 2.

this current "problem" or "challenge", if you prefer, was predicted in 1990, by my ERASMUS Professor, during my time at the University of Patras in Greece.  It was also, back up, by research, at the University of Copenhagen, into alternative sources of energy supply.

 

Respond To Original Comment | this Comment
  Hopes for the future
Andrew

My understanding is that fusion does not have a military use so a Manhattan-like project would not be forthcoming.

I read some research lately suggesting that lasers could be used to produce controlled fusion but half a billion was needed just for the initial research. At such a cost it is not surprising that private funds are unavailable. It would need a brave politician indeed to advance that much cash.

As a long term strategy converting energy from sunlight into bio-fuel seems very inefficient. When oil is refined it also uses up a great deal of energy. It seems that you must pay twice.

Respond To Original Comment | this Comment
 
   
   
In responce to your answer to my comment
Subscriber

Unfortunately, it is Manhattan Project, still funding and sustained for around 15 years, that is required to find the solutions to our long term energy needs.  That level of funding, requires international cooperation, at least, at G8 Levels. 

It requires an informed public and leadership, by our most senior politicians on all sides of the meanstream political spectrum.

this problem, was foreseen after the first major oil crises of the early 1970's.  Do we need another 37 years, of wasted time, before we act.  That is forgetting that the 1973 doubling and then 1974 quadrulling of the price of oil and other key commodities was also predicted, by scientists.

Radical innovations, just do happen by pure accident, they require what Edison called genius.  99% perspiration and 1% inspiration, and that needs consistent funding as well as dedication.

As for Biofuels they have their place too, as they do provide a covertion ratio of 10 units of energy produced to 1 unit of energy consumed, in the processes, for the most efficient systems.  They also have the posibility of driving Political reform, with regards to Agricultural subsidies.  Which are far higher than your 1/2 billion research budget, in the EU allown let alone the US.

Respond To Original Comment | this Comment
Comments.
To be able to post comments you must be a member of Climate and Environment Media or EASTjournal.
If you are not yet a member you may apply here.
To be emailed a forgotten password Click here.
this is a 2D comments board and you may comment on other's comments.
Please use it responsibly.
Title
Comment
Email
Password
Email a friend this Article

Related Articles
Politics, Power and Impunity in Indonesia’s Plantations Boom06/06/2008
A Question Of Spelling;  is it Biofuel, biofuel, bio-fuel or Bio-06/06/2008
Rising Oil Prices: How Will We Drive Our Cars?05/06/2008
AP Innovations Completes Installation of 13th Biodiesel Plant28/05/2008